| Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2010-09-09 04:12 CEST | ![]() |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap |
| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | |
| 0004579 | Clover Designer | (No Category) | public | 2010-07-20 04:31 | 2010-08-02 10:53 | |
| Reporter | dnrickner | |||||
| Assigned To | pnajvar | |||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | N/A | |
| Status | closed | Resolution | suspended | |||
| Platform | Windows X86-32bit | OS | Windows | OS Version | XP/2000 | |
| Product Version | rel-2-9-3 | |||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | |||||
| Summary | 0004579: input output ports in CTL | |||||
| Description | It is confusing having $0.field := $0.field; inside CTL. Could we somehow distinguish referencing an input port vs an output port? perhaps something like this: in.$0.field := out.$0.field; | |||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | |||||
| OTRS_Ticket_ID | ||||||
| Time estimate (manhours) | ||||||
| Time duration (manhours) | ||||||
| Completion status | 10 | |||||
| Attached Files | ||||||
Notes |
|
|
(0008782) pnajvar (administrator) 2010-08-02 10:53 |
I know what you mean, it might be confusing but after all it can be always directly distinguished by whether it's a l-value (for output ports) or not for inputs. We might consider allowing for more readable syntax in the future |
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2010-07-20 04:31 | dnrickner | New Issue | |
| 2010-08-02 10:53 | pnajvar | Note Added: 0008782 | |
| 2010-08-02 10:53 | pnajvar | Status | new => closed |
| 2010-08-02 10:53 | pnajvar | Assigned To | => pnajvar |
| 2010-08-02 10:53 | pnajvar | Resolution | open => suspended |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2010 MantisBT Group |